<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>manton / low-costapps</title>
    <description>Tweets from the collection Low-cost Apps on tweetlibrary.com.</description>
    <link>http://tweetlibrary.com/manton/low-costapps</link>
    <item>
      <title>drbarnard</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/drbarnard/statuses/159489882656481280</link>
      <description>@Lessien “milking single apps,” or lovingly crafting and expanding on apps that bring value and/or entertainment to a loyal userbase</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 04:18:45 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/drbarnard/statuses/159489882656481280</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>drbarnard</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/drbarnard/statuses/159489242341449729</link>
      <description>@Lessien and I'm acutely aware that the gold rush wont last. I've wanted to generate a bigger short-term success to help long term stability</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 04:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/drbarnard/statuses/159489242341449729</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Lessien</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/Lessien/statuses/159488394089603072</link>
      <description>@drbarnard Barring changes, IAP is a reasonable course. But, fundamentally, App Store dynamics discourage devs from milking single apps.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 04:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/Lessien/statuses/159488394089603072</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>drbarnard</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/drbarnard/statuses/159487498697969664</link>
      <description>@Lessien but the volatility of the App Store scared me away from investing in niche apps with obvious revenue ceilings &amp; no paid updates</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 04:09:17 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/drbarnard/statuses/159487498697969664</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>drbarnard</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/drbarnard/statuses/159486875080474624</link>
      <description>@Lessien True, I've been spinning my wheels trying all sorts of stuff when I could have been more focused on polishing/extending my apps.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 04:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/drbarnard/statuses/159486875080474624</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Lessien</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/Lessien/statuses/159485022183755776</link>
      <description>@drbarnard The open question is whether visibility must come at the expense of financial viability. Price is just one factor.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 03:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/Lessien/statuses/159485022183755776</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>drbarnard</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/drbarnard/statuses/159484485786812416</link>
      <description>@Lessien Ah, that was a great post! Re-reading it now to refresh my memory.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 03:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/drbarnard/statuses/159484485786812416</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Lessien</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/Lessien/statuses/159483907786547200</link>
      <description>@drbarnard I don't underestimate it. I'm arguing that success isn't always about hitting grand slams (e.g. the "Two App Stores" post).</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 03:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/Lessien/statuses/159483907786547200</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>drbarnard</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/drbarnard/statuses/159483572590346242</link>
      <description>@Lessien the damn Mirror app I built now gets almost 3k downloads a day because I changed the name to Mirror ◎ (search ignores glyphs)</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 03:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/drbarnard/statuses/159483572590346242</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>drbarnard</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/drbarnard/statuses/159482922045419520</link>
      <description>@Lessien an app like Angry Birds may spread through word of mouth and goodwill, but growing sales for niche apps is all about visibility.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 03:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/drbarnard/statuses/159482922045419520</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>drbarnard</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/drbarnard/statuses/159482497774780417</link>
      <description>@Lessien and the way rankings and search work, lowering an app's price is a great way to get better visibility.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 03:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/drbarnard/statuses/159482497774780417</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>drbarnard</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/drbarnard/statuses/159482190202286080</link>
      <description>@Lessien I think you underestimate how skewed the market is, especially for niche apps. Visibility in the App Store is what drives sales.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 03:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/drbarnard/statuses/159482190202286080</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Lessien</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/Lessien/statuses/159481245913460737</link>
      <description>@drbarnard It's futile to worry about the competition. Have you built a good business and relationships with customers? That's what matters.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 03:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/Lessien/statuses/159481245913460737</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>drbarnard</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/drbarnard/statuses/159480755163115521</link>
      <description>@Lessien @counternotions That would help support higher prices for niche apps as users could try several and pay more for the best app.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 03:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/drbarnard/statuses/159480755163115521</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>drbarnard</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/drbarnard/statuses/159480460358070272</link>
      <description>@Lessien @counternotions If there's one thing I'm still hopeful for, it's that Apple will somehow better facilitate app trials.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 03:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/drbarnard/statuses/159480460358070272</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>drbarnard</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/drbarnard/statuses/159479699351932932</link>
      <description>@Lessien @counternotions I do price up, $5 is "extremely expensive". I've lost tons of ground to competitors at lower prices.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 03:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/drbarnard/statuses/159479699351932932</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Lessien</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/Lessien/statuses/159474378596286465</link>
      <description>@drbarnard @counternotions But developers know that going in. Why not price up to capture what you might otherwise gain from paid upgrades ?</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 03:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/Lessien/statuses/159474378596286465</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>drbarnard</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/drbarnard/statuses/159473552746233857</link>
      <description>@counternotions but most of us aren't selling consumables &amp;  won't let us charge for updates. *Temporary* high volume, permanent low price</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 03:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/drbarnard/statuses/159473552746233857</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>counternotions</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/counternotions/statuses/159472152347803648</link>
      <description>@drbarnard Good points, but won't change the inevitable value prop: mobile = high volume @ low price.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 03:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/counternotions/statuses/159472152347803648</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>drbarnard</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/drbarnard/statuses/159470637772058626</link>
      <description>@counternotions I've given up on Apple doing anything about it, but for reference, check the bottom of this 2009 post: http://t.co/eoobl7hZ</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 03:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/drbarnard/statuses/159470637772058626</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>counternotions</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/counternotions/statuses/159463797017419777</link>
      <description>@drbarnard I'm still not clear what you want Apple to do. Raise app prices? Reduce competition? Raise iOS device prices? @mpanzarino</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 02:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/counternotions/statuses/159463797017419777</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>drbarnard</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/drbarnard/statuses/159410331247063041</link>
      <description>@manton and "you make apps? I've got this idea, we'll make millions". Most people have a *complete* disconnect from reality in the App Store</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 23:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/drbarnard/statuses/159410331247063041</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>manton</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/manton/statuses/159409564368908289</link>
      <description>@drbarnard Good post. The biggest problem is users don't understand that 99 cents is only possible for mainstream, bestsellers.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 22:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/manton/statuses/159409564368908289</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>drbarnard</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/drbarnard/statuses/159407813171494912</link>
      <description>“It’d be a shame if the mobile software industry devolved into some horrific hybrid of Zynga and Facebook.” http://t.co/rgbcFQps</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 22:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/drbarnard/statuses/159407813171494912</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>drbarnard</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/drbarnard/statuses/159399227942899712</link>
      <description>Free and Low-Cost Apps http://t.co/rgbcFQps</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 22:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/drbarnard/statuses/159399227942899712</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

